top of page

Rethinking Regulation: What TEQSA Needs to Do Next

  • Oct 10, 2025
  • 2 min read

Post Accord consultation on TEQSA reform looks comprehensive at first glance. Sixteen questions spread neatly across four themes. In reality, respondents are restricted to filling a form against these 16 prompts. That framing shapes what is asked, and what answers can be given.

If the questions are narrowly procedural, the answers can only be narrowly procedural. What the sector needs is a regulator that acts, not another cycle of meetings with the usual suspects.


Powers TEQSA Already Has Under the Act

Under the TEQSA Act, the regulator already has significant powers:

  • Registration and accreditation

  • Monitoring and compliance

  • Enforcement actions including sanctions

  • Governance oversight

TEQSA is not lacking authority. The issue is not power — it is how those powers are used.


Where the Gap Lies

The gap is not legislative. It is cultural.

  • Reluctance to intervene

  • Narrow focus on individual providers

  • Positioning as a “partner” rather than regulator

This has resulted in a system where compliance is monitored, but systemic risks are often left unaddressed.


What the Consultation Asks vs What the Sector Needs

The consultation asks what new powers TEQSA should have.

The better question is:

Why isn't TEQSA using the powers it already has?


Theme 1: A Regulatory System That Puts Students First

  • Students should have a meaningful role in shaping standards

  • Lived experience should inform regulatory decisions


Theme 2: A Modern Regulator

  • Shift from reactive compliance to proactive prevention

  • Act earlier where risks are visible


Theme 3: Streamlined Regulation

  • Reduce duplication across agencies

  • Improve data sharing

  • Maintain transparency without increasing reporting burden


Theme 4: A Joined-Up Tertiary System

  • Address cross-sector challenges

  • Respond to system-wide disruptions


Closing Thought

Reform will not come from better consultation forms. It will come from a regulator willing to act decisively, independently, and transparently.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Harmonisation is Not the Goal — It's the Enabler

Bottom line up front: Harmonisation between VET and higher education is not the goal. It's the enabler. But unless we are clear about what it is enabling, it risks becoming just another policy slogan.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page